Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Sailing the River of Satire

Satire is defined as the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. So you’re probably thinking, “How could such a fun book as the Adventures of Huckleberry  Finn actually be so serious?” All of the chaos and ridiculousness of the great American novel by Mark Twain is satirizing American society. Twain uses satire to explore the civilization (or shall I say “sivilization”?) of American society in the 1800s. I am quite sad to say that there will be no Taylor Swift connection in this post. Please forgive me!
Alright, let’s take another look at the definition of satire: the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. I’m pretty sure we should just delete the “or” before the word “ridicule” because Twain is a real overachiever and uses them ALL in Huck Finn. Yup, that’s right.
I continue: There is uncanny humor throughout the course of the novel and, as I stated in my previous post, there were countless times where I actually laughed out loud. I think that’s proof enough for you, right? No? Okay. So here’s a quotation (no, not “quote”) that might result in a LOL or two: “What's the use you learning to do right, when it's troublesome to do right and ain't no trouble to do wrong, and the wages is just the same?” (Chapter 16) HAHAHA *slaps knee* Twain uses humor here to show that American civilization has taken a wrong turn because many individuals know it is sometimes easier to do the wrong thing and not the moral thing.
Moving on to the next part of the satire definition: irony. Now we all know from Shakespeare’s Othello that there can be three kinds of irony: dramatic, situational, and verbal. Twain is a bit of an overachiever, again, because he uses all three. For now, I’m going to focus on how Twain uses verbal irony to satirize American society in the 1800s. During Huck’s trek with Jim, they come across a man by the name of Jake Packard who explains his ideals on killing: “‘See? He'll be drownded, and won't have nobody to blame for it but his own self. I reckon that's a considerable sight better'n killin' of him. I'm unfavorable to killin' a man as long as you can git aroun' it; it ain't good sense, it ain't good morals. Ain't I right?’” (Chapter 12) Basically ‘ole Jake is saying that it’s better to let a man drown than to blatantly kill him. What a great guy, huh? This use of verbal irony helps Twain satirize the fact that American civilization has ultimately become idiotic and cruel, with the hopes that this can be reformed.
Next up: exaggeration. Exaggeration is the act of magnifying something beyond the limits of truth, which Twain does quite often in Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. For example, Twain often exaggerates Jim’s character through the use of caricature. Jim is made out to seem like an extremely unintelligent runaway slave, considering that all of his dialogue is spelled improperly within the actual text. In chapter 40 Jim says, “Well, den, dis is de way it look to me, Huck. Ef it wuz HIM dat 'uz bein' sot free, en one er de boys wuz to git shot, would he say, 'Go on en save me, nemmine 'bout a doctor f'r to save dis one?' Is dat like Mars Tom Sawyer? Would he say dat? You BET he wouldn't! WELL, den, is JIM gywne to say it? No, sah—I doan' budge a step out'n dis place 'dout a DOCTOR, not if it's forty year.” It took me quite a while to translate exactly what Jim was saying and what he meant every time he spoke in the novel. The very notion that Jim’s speech is exaggerated, reveals its use as a satirical element in order to express that most white Americans were extremely prejudice of African American slaves in the American south during the 1800s.
Alright, let’s talk about the ridicule aspect of satire. This explanation should be quick because it’s plain and simple. Woohoo! This aspect is more of an undertone because Twain’s actual subject of ridicule in this novel is the 1800s American civilization. Twain does so by using all of the other parts of the satire definition. If you forgot, I’ll refresh your memory: humor, irony, and exaggeration. Additionally, ridicule is used when portraying Jim’s character and is often used when the introducing the Duke and the King. If you pay attention and look closely, ridicule is pretty much everywhere throughout Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.


Until next time, my fellow literature lovers!

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Long Live Huck Finn

“Long live the walls we crashed through
All the kingdom lights shined just for me and you
I was screaming, ‘long live all the magic we made’
And bring on all the pretenders
I'm not afraid”
- Long Live, Taylor Swift


Mark Twain’s satirical novel, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, radiates with the excitement of adventure while eliciting feelings of nostalgia from its audience. Whether it's climbing a tree, pretending to be thieves on the hunt, or sailing down a river, Huck and his companions really know how to keep the magic of childhood alive while facing abundant challenges. Guess what connection I’ll be making in this post! Yeah, that’s right: Taylor Swift.
Right off the bat, Huck, Tom, and the gang sneak out of their houses in the dead of night to engage in some extreme adventure. Their first adventure is taking a journey to a cave somewhere in their hometown and starting their business of thievery. Which, of course, reminds me of Taylor Swift’s song, Long Live, where she sings, “For a moment a band of thieves in ripped up jeans got to rule the world.” In all honesty, I don’t think I could’ve inserted a more perfect song lyric to relate to Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Don’t laugh. . .I’m serious! Make fun of me all you want but, when you think about it, Huck Finn is a poor boy who wears rags for clothes (hence the “ripped up jeans”). He goes on magnificent adventures with his crew, during which they pretend they are quite dominant over the rest of the world (hence the “rule the world” aspect). Who knew Taylor Swift lyrics would be perfectly relatable to a satirical novel that is well over one hundred years old?
I continue. . .Huck’s adventures suggest that even the youngest and poorest of individuals can be completely independent and intelligent. Huck and his friends are exaggerated versions of the stereotypical wild and adventures children. For example, there is a point in the book where Huck is living completely on his own in the woods, hunting for each of his meals and building his own form of shelter. I’m quite sure this is not a realistic interpretation of a child surviving on his own in the wilderness because most children wouldn’t know even the most basic of survival skills. However, these exaggerations express that courage and imagination can take you just about anywhere.

If you’re ever looking for a bit of nostalgia for your childhood and some literary entertainment, then you should definitely give Huck Finn a try. I highly recommend it! It’s very upbeat and fun with historical and cultural undertones of the American West. So far, there have been countless times while reading that I have actually laughed out loud because of the absurdity of the events and logic of the book. There was this one time when. . .well, I won’t ruin it for you. You’re just going to have to read it for yourself! But definitely keep in mind those Taylor Swift lyrics while you’re reading.


Saturday, January 9, 2016

I Knew You Were Trouble (Remix)

“I knew you were trouble when you walked in
So shame on me now
Flew me to places I'd never been
Now I'm lying on the cold hard ground
Oh, oh, trouble, trouble, trouble”


The above lyrics are from the Taylor Swift song that Othello was most likely singing in his head when he found out that Iago was really a lying, deceitful snake. Well, either that song or possibly Bad Blood. Considering that Othello was made out to be such a humble character, it seems fair to say that he had, for the most part, blamed himself for the murder of Desdemona. However, I see things a bit differently . . .
Although Othello is definitely partially to blame for the horrific conundrum of Desdemona’s murder, Iago holds a greater deal of the blame. After all, without Iago’s beguiling character there would be no ghastly murder. I guess there would also be no play then, either, huh?
First off, Iago uses jealousy as a rational excuse to plot revenge against Othello. Iago is green with envy because Othello chose Michael Cassio, an arithmetician, over Iago to become Othello’s lieutenant. Additionally, Iago informs the audience that there is a rumor that Othello slept with his wife, Emilia. He goes on to say that he does not have to investigate this situation further, for the fact that it is merely a rumor is proof enough for him. Is it me or does Iago seem a bit vengeful? Here’s where Iago gets really evil: He deliberately tells Othello that Cassio and Desdemona are having an affair, knowing that this is false information and that it will cause Othello immense pain. To further his evil scheme and making him even more to blame for the murder of Desdemona, Iago gets possession of Desdemona’s handkerchief and strategically places it inside of Cassio’s chamber. This is not just any handkerchief though! This handkerchief was Othello’s mother’s and it is said to have been made with magic by a two-hundred-year-old witch. Pretty creepy stuff. This handkerchief was given to Desdemona by Othello as a symbol of their love, and if it is lost Othello will magically fall out of love with Desdemona. Nice going, Iago. But wait, there’s more: Iago makes Othello hide as he and Cassio discuss Cassio’s relationship with Bianca. However, Othello believes that Iago and Cassio are discussing Cassio’s relationship with Desdemona and Othello becomes extremely angered by all of Cassio’s laughing and passionate talk. Poor Othello.

I know what you’re all thinking: “But Othello was the one who did the killing!” You’re right and I do not disregard this fact. Let’s think about this differently, shall we? Say, a man starts a fire so that it might burn down a whole house. Who is to blame then? The fire itself or the man who set the fire? The man who intentionally set the fire, of course! In terms of Shakespeare’s play, Othello, the man is Iago, the fire is Othello, and the house is Desdemona. Ultimately, without the man to set the fire there would be no burnt-down house.